6 August 2026
Quick recap
The main topics discussed included strategies for completing assessment tasks, including tips for naming ceremonies, handling feedback on submissions, and managing the chronological flow of funeral ceremonies. Students shared updates on their progress, with Student A discussing her approach to booking practical sessions and working backwards from a set date, while Student B reported completing her naming ceremony task despite some challenges with swaying during the recording and having to backtrack on amendments. The meeting also covered practical advice about camera angles for certificate signing, the importance of including music recommendations in ceremony reports even when clients request no music, and reassurance about the value of receiving detailed feedback to improve future performances.
Summary
Streamlined Assessment Process Discussion
Sarah and Student A discussed streamlining the assessment process by having participants complete all recordings on the same day and using questionnaires to gather information instead of conducting separate interviews. Sarah explained that using participants’ actual words from the questionnaire makes the ceremony more authentic and reduces the burden on both the participants and facilitators. They agreed that this approach would be more efficient and effective for gathering the necessary information for the ceremony.
Client Filming Requirements Flexibility
Sarah advised Student B that when interview participants add unexpected elements during filming, she should handle it as if the client later changed their mind via email, allowing flexibility in the final script. Sarah shared examples of how client requirements often change in real-world situations. The discussion also touched on the challenge of teaching students to balance thoroughness with practical client expectations.
Feedback and Professional Development Discussion
Sarah and Student A discussed challenges with receiving constructive feedback from ceremony participants, with Student A noting that while she receives positive comments, she struggles to get specific feedback to improve. Sarah advised Student A to find a professional development task, even something small like a public speaking course, to help with her growth.
Project Submission and Task Updates
Student A discussed the need for an extension, which Sarah confirmed could be submitted now since she had met the hurdle requirement. Sarah advised Student A to start working on Task 28 (ceremony component collation) immediately by copying and pasting from her Ceremonial Recommendations report.
Naming Ceremony Performance Feedback
Student B reported completing her naming ceremony but had to make some tweaks and backtrack on her 80th birthday documents due to overlapping work on multiple tasks.Sarah advised the students not to worry if they disliked the naming ceremonies, explaining that they can be challenging but are good practice for future celebrant work. Student B shared her experience performing a naming ceremony with her family members playing the roles, and received feedback about swaying during the ceremony. Sarah acknowledged that swaying can be difficult to overcome, and advised Student B to plant her feet and stay in the camera shot during future ceremonies.
Practical Guidance and Case Study
Student D expressed concerns about remembering everything for practicals, but Sarah reassured her that the detailed instructions provided would help, suggesting she print them out as checklists. Student C discussed her progress on the Dorothy Rivers case study, asking whether it could be assumed the coffin was in place at the beginning of the ceremony, which Sarah confirmed. Student C also shared her approach to organising information chronologically and received confirmation from Sarah that different scripts are acceptable as long as they approximate the correct timeline.
Teenager Funeral Exercise Planning
Student C discussed challenges with finding participants for an upcoming teenager-focused funeral exercise, expressing concern about the age and circumstances involved. Sarah assured her that alternative methods of death could be used if the suicide factor proved too difficult, citing examples of previous course modifications for similar situations.
Wedding Ceremony Planning Insights
Student E met with her mentor and gained valuable insights. Student F completed their naming ceremony and discussed camera angles for certificate signing, with Sarah recommending using a tabletop tripod or having someone hold the phone to clearly show who is signing where. Student F also clarified with Sarah that music should be included in ceremony recommendations even when clients say no music is required, as the recommendations report is prepared before meeting clients.
Birthday Report Template Feedback Discussion
Sarah provided feedback to Student F about her 80th birthday report template, encouraging her to complete the revisions and submit the updated version. Sarah emphasised that feedback should be taken constructively as a learning opportunity rather than personally, sharing an example of a successful graduate who had initially received poor feedback but improved significantly. Student F reported meeting with her mentor who provided similar guidance about not taking feedback personally and encouraged continued practice through upcoming ceremonies.
22 July 2026
Quick recap
This was a celebrancy course support meeting where students discussed their progress with various assessment tasks. Student A reported working on her naming ceremony script and received feedback about adapting the format and including pre-ceremony checks and equipment lists. Student B discussed her progress with vow renewal tasks, including improvements made after feedback and her experience using a Kindle for scripts. Student C confirmed her plan to film her ceremony over the weekend before going on holiday, and Student D mentioned working on the networking task preparation. The conversation ended with Sarah confirming the submission timeline requirements for the course.
Summary
Celebrant Updates and Developments
Sarah updated the group on current celebrancy matters, including outgoing invoices for registration charges and a newly released celebrant survey by the Attorney General’s Department. She noted that while compulsory professional development is required (2 hours annually), many celebrants who complain about it failed to respond to previous feedback opportunities. Sarah also mentioned hiring a marketing company that has increased her visibility on social media platforms.
Naming Ceremony Script Progress Review
Student A discussed her progress on her naming ceremony script, which she recently submitted and received feedback on from Tania. She explained how she had to restructure parts of her writing to accommodate additional description requirements and adjust the format based on how her ideas flowed naturally. Sarah and Tania provided guidance about the flexibility of ceremony formats and the importance of being adaptable when working with clients, noting that the manual’s structure is negotiable and can be adjusted based on what works best for each specific ceremony.
Ceremony Planning Discussion
Sarah discussed the importance of structuring wedding ceremonies with a flowing beginning, middle, and end, and explained how to place rituals appropriately based on their meaning to the couple. Tania shared her creative idea of creating personalised scratch-off cards for a couple’s wedding, including a special message on one card.
Ceremony Equipment Checklist Discussion
Student A discussed the equipment checklist for ceremonies, clarifying with Sarah that it should include everything needed for delivery, from pens to props. Student A expressed feeling overwhelmed by the number of tasks involved but learned that the checklist should be completed first, followed by the booking form and invoice in the specified order. Sarah advised that Student A could apply lessons learned from this process to future ceremonies.
Standardised Service Agreements Process
Sarah explained that she uses standardised service agreements for different types of ceremonies, including weddings, naming ceremonies, and vow renewals, with only minor adaptations needed for specific clients. She clarified that the agreements are not fully customised for each client but are adapted from existing templates based on the type of ceremony. Tania noted that feedback might occasionally mention irrelevant details in the agreements, but changes are generally not required unless specific circumstances arise. Sarah explained her approach to client agreements, noting that while standard terms require payment a month in advance, she makes exceptions for urgent bookings like weddings.
Project Progress and Filming Updates
The group discussed filming arrangements, with Student A’s daughter asking about seeing her face in the video, and Sarah reassuring her that the footage would only be seen by course staff and not shared online. Student B reported progress on her vow renewal project, having completed a draft and resubmitted with corrections based on feedback from a course assessor, who marked her first submission. Student B noted she used an existing contract from her first submission rather than starting fresh with the template, and Tania mentioned that Student B’s work was in the assessor’s queue for review.
Project Updates and Timeline Discussion
Student B discussed her progress with three documents, including a vow renewal script that received positive feedback and updates. She shared her experience using a Kindle and cordless microphone for better handling during filming, and received advice from Sarah about formatting scripts for Kindle, including starting new sentences on new pages and using appropriate font sizes. Student C updated the group on her project timeline, confirming she would aim to film and submit her work over the weekend, with Sarah clarifying that the first submission of all tasks must be completed by the end of enrolment, followed by a month for finalisation. Student D confirmed she was working on prep work for her networking task and had received an email from Sarah about the relevant contact’s involvement.
8 July 2026
Quick recap
Student A reported on her networking task progress and mentioned rescheduling her mentor meeting, with Tania advising her to email when ready to proceed and warning against double-booking. Student B shared her experience completing her first practical submission, which wasn’t perfect but showed improvement over initial public speaking challenges, with Tania and Sarah reassuring her that first attempts rarely succeed and providing guidance on future submissions. Student C and Student D discussed their business plan work, with Student C seeking clarification about cost estimates and tax calculations, while Student D received reassurance about not needing to make the plan financially viable and confirmation that required content could be found in the course materials. Student E participated as an observer, sharing that she was learning from the discussions and had benefited from the advice to not overthink assignments, particularly regarding character counts and answer brevity.
Summary
Networking Progress and Updates
Sarah welcomed Student D, who was attending for the first time. Student A reported on her networking progress, explaining that her mentor meeting was rescheduled from Tuesday to Wednesday due to the mentor’s double-booking. Student A decided to submit dummy tasks in the meantime and completed e-learning materials, taking detailed notes to ensure she doesn’t miss any steps.
Student Assessment and Progress Updates
Tania informed Student A that her assessments have been parked and requested her to email when ready to proceed with networking. Tania also advised Student A not to double-book appointments like her previous mentor did. Student B shared her experience with her first practical submission, which wasn’t perfect but helped her understand the process better, and the team reassured her that improvement is expected as students progress through the program.
Ceremony Recording Feedback Discussion
Student B discussed feedback on her ceremony recording, where she initially thought she had made significant errors but later realised the issue was minor and didn’t require a complete re-recording. Sarah clarified that while Student B’s casual attire was acceptable for this submission, future recordings should follow specific dress guidelines if mentioned in feedback.
Business Plan Requirements Clarification
Student C updated the group on her progress with the business plan and sought clarification about cost estimates and references, which Sarah explained should focus on sourcing ideas and content rather than the origin of cost figures. Sarah explained that students don’t need to provide detailed financial viability reports or accurate figures, as the assessment is about demonstrating the process rather than evaluating the plan’s feasibility. She confirmed that all students must include their CVs as part of the submission, which will be reviewed for realism rather than accuracy. The discussion also covered practical advice about character counts in responses and the importance of not overcomplicating assignments, with examples given about keeping answers concise while meeting requirements.
24 June 2026
Quick recap
Student A successfully submitted her business plan despite being sick, while Student B needed help with quiz questions about Jewish death traditions and was advised to read the content carefully. Alison expressed concerns about over-answering questions but was reassured that her detailed responses were appropriate, and she was encouraged to submit her first task for feedback. Jenny submitted her first naming script for review and discussed her mentor situation, including an upcoming opportunity to attend a wedding with her mentor Sam on July 13th. Savannah also submitted her naming script and shared her experience writing it, noting she found it helpful to read the content as if someone was speaking it. Tania emphasized the importance of getting one task marked as satisfactory before submitting others to avoid repeated feedback on the same mistakes.
Summary
Business Plan Submission and Mentoring
Student A successfully submitted her business plan, though it was completed later than intended due to illness. Sarah encouraged her to now focus on mentoring and networking opportunities, suggesting she review the available mentors and contact Sarah with her preferences.
Quiz Question Guidance Session
Sarah provided guidance to Student B regarding a quiz question about Jewish death traditions, advising her to review the content pack and carefully read the exact wording of answers. Student A suggested paying close attention to the exact order of words in the answers. Later, Sarah advised Student C to focus on “less is more” when answering questions, though Student C expressed concern about potentially over-answering despite staying within word limits.
Task Progress and Feedback Discussion
Student C discussed her progress on a task, expressing that while she initially found it more bookish than expected, she found it interesting and relevant. Sarah advised Student C to submit her first draft and not get stuck, promising detailed feedback. Student D shared her first naming script and received confirmation about writing a mentor reading, though Sarah clarified that future tasks should follow the specified instructions rather than including custom readings.
Scripting and Recording Progress Update
Student D discussed her progress on scripting and recording, explaining she hasn’t scheduled a recording date yet due to recent completion of scripting and waiting for feedback. Tania advised Student D to work on the assignments but submit only one section at a time to avoid duplicate feedback, as she currently has two students making similar mistakes across different sections. Student D shared positive news about attending a wedding with her mentor.
Naming Script Review Discussion
The team discussed Student E submission of a naming script for review. WeStudent E ding shared that writing the script took some time to get the flow right, and they found it helpful to read the content as if someone was speaking it rather than just reading it. The group celebrated this as the first step in the process, with Sarah noting there are no expectations for perfection since it’s only the first submission.
10 June 2026
Quick recap
Tania shared that she was dealing with a challenging funeral situation involving family disputes over incorrect funeral information being posted online, while also working on business plan and networking tasks. Student A celebrated completing her first practical task and received guidance on recording her upcoming phone interview using Zoom with cameras off. Student B discussed progress on her business and marketing plan, with Sarah advising her to break the task into smaller sections and seek input from colleagues about her strengths. Student C reported meeting with her mentor and received feedback on her business plan regarding ceremony service offerings. Student E confirmed she was making good progress and would continue working through early stages of the program. Student D discussed her networking tasks and reached out about her upcoming holiday, with Sarah explaining the process for handling delayed mentor meetings.
Summary
Celebrant Regulations Update
Sarah reported on her recent trip to Canberra where she attended meetings about celebrant regulations. She discussed a proposal from an association to require celebrants to include contact information on the Public Register of Celebrants, but noted that the Australian Government (AG) rejected this idea, emphasising that celebrants should have control over their personal information. Sarah also mentioned that while the new NOIM would be beneficial if approved, they still need to go through public consultation, with previous attempts to remove parents’ names and occupation being reversed due to opposition from family historians.
Practical Task Interview Process Discussion
Student A completed her first practical task and has scheduled a phone interview for the 80th task to be conducted via Zoom with cameras off. Sarah clarified that recording on Zoom with cameras disabled is acceptable, as phone recording methods vary and are difficult to standardise. Tania added that unusual file types might not be accessible on different devices, recommending testing the upload process beforehand. Student A received encouragement for completing her first ceremony writing task, with Sarah noting how many people get stuck after task 15.
Student B shared her progress on the business and marketing plan, receiving advice from Sarah to break the task into smaller pieces and not get overwhelmed by the whole process.
Celebrant Business Development Discussion
The group discussed several topics related to celebrant business development. Student B sought advice on identifying her strengths and opportunities in the market, with Sarah suggesting she ask colleagues about her skills and research competitor websites. Student C reported on her upcoming mentoring session and received clarification from Tania about completing her business plan requirements. The group also addressed networking tasks, with Student D discussing her progress and timeline for completing her networking module, which is about two weeks behind schedule.
27 May 2026
Quick recap
Sarah welcomed new student Student A and facilitated the session, while Tania and other students provided updates and support. Student B received clarification about resubmission processes and task requirements, particularly regarding the ordering of ceremony elements in Task 5B. Student C discussed her upcoming first practical assessment and received advice about filming requirements and props for the tree planting exercise. Student D shared her experience with the Safe and Inclusive Celebrancy Practice Module, which prompted meaningful discussions with family members about biases. Student E asked about overlapping sections in her business plan and received reassurance that the interconnected nature of the requirements was intentional.
Summary
Program Session Welcome and Updates
Sarah welcomed a large group to the session, including new participant Student A who just started the program. Student F returned to the group after an absence, explaining that life circumstances had prevented him from completing assignments but he continues working with licensed celebrants on wedding planning and scripting. Sarah advised Student F that while life challenges are inevitable, maintaining study progress is important for future practice, and they agreed to discuss his situation further after the session.
Task Requirements and Resubmission Guidelines
Student B sought clarification about resubmission requirements and specific task feedback. Sarah explained that Student B needs to complete Task 4B before returning to Task 5B due to the system’s locking mechanism to prevent tasks from getting stuck. Sarah also clarified that Task 5B requires listing six things that must be done during a marriage ceremony, not in a specific order, and confirmed that resubmissions are normal and expected.
Practical Filming Session Planning
Student C discussed her upcoming practical filming session scheduled for next Wednesday, where she will film her naming ceremony with her mother and a friend. Sarah advised Student C to follow the provided instructions precisely for filming setup and start location. The group also clarified that Student C could use props like a pretend tree for the tree planting scene and could film with just her phone, with no need for a dedicated cameraperson.
New Student Ceremony Support Discussion
The group discussed support for a new student preparing for their first celebrancy ceremony, with Tania and Sarah emphasizing that it’s normal to not be perfect and that feedback will help improve over time. Student C confirmed she had selected her outfit and was ready to proceed with her first ceremony. The discussion also covered communication channels, with clarification that the WhatsApp group is for student-to-student interactions while the training email is for instructor support, and Jamieson shared observations about attending a Syrian Orthodox wedding which highlighted the differences between religious and civil ceremonies.
Safe and Inclusive Celebrancy Practices
The group discussed their experiences with a celebrancy course module on safe and inclusive practice. Tania shared details about a rehearsal for a Cambodian couple having both a cultural and legal wedding. Student D described her challenging experience with the Safe and Inclusive Celebrancy Practice Module assessment, which required extensive research to understand complex questions about biases and prejudices. Sarah explained that the module aims to help students reflect on their own biases rather than requiring specific knowledge of obscure terms.
Course Work Progress Discussion
The group discussed progress on course work, with Student D reporting she needs to complete the maintaining celebrancy practice section and assessment before moving to the business plan phase. Student E sought advice about overlapping content in her business plan, particularly regarding how SWOT analysis information connects to other sections like mitigation strategies and budget planning. Sarah and Tania reassured Student E that overlapping content is normal and part of the learning process, comparing it to real-world business situations where different aspects often connect and require integration.
Practical Task Progress Discussion
Student E discussed her progress on practical tasks and clarified with Sarah that she cannot rearrange the timing of her grandson’s baby naming ceremony, as the qualification requires specific case studies to be completed in a particular order. Sarah confirmed that while Student E cannot use her grandson’s ceremony for the practical task, doing the July ceremony will provide good practice for the future baby naming.
13 May 2026
Quick recap
The conversation covered students’ progress on modules including branding and marketing, safe and inclusive celebrancy practice, and business planning. Several students shared their challenges with specific assessments, with Student A finding the branding module challenging but manageable, and Student B expressing enthusiasm about the business plan component. The instructors provided advice about not getting stuck on technical details and emphasised that the process of creating a business plan was more important than the final outcome.
Summary
Funeral Ceremony Planning Challenges
Sarah explained her process of providing personalised suggestions during initial meetings, including poems, music, and ceremony structure options, rather than bringing pre-prepared materials. Tania shared her approach of bringing personalised suggestion sheets to meetings, agreeing on a ceremony structure, and sending the order of service to the funeral director.
Client Challenges and Marketing Progress
Sarah and Tania discussed their experiences with challenging client interactions, including situations where families rejected their services due to personal preferences or unusual circumstances. Student A shared her progress with the branding, sales, and marketing module, expressing that it was challenging but manageable. Sarah advised Student A not to worry too much about the technical details of branding and marketing, suggesting she should focus on gaining a general understanding to help with future decisions, rather than becoming an expert in the field.
Business Branding Strategy Discussion
The group discussed the importance of not getting overwhelmed by details when developing a business brand. Sarah advised against getting stuck on minor elements like website perfection or color choices, sharing an example of a previous student who delayed launching their business for a year over similar concerns. Tania shared her experience of outsourcing her website redesign and keeping her original black and gold color scheme, which was recommended by her designer. The discussion emphasised that branding thoughts and directions often evolve over time, particularly after practical experience, and that it’s important to move forward rather than get stuck on perfect details.
Safe and Inclusive Assessment Discussion
Student B discussed her experience completing the safe and inclusive celebrancy practice assessment, which she found challenging and thought-provoking. Sarah explained that the difficult nature of the assessment is intentional, aiming to make participants reflect on their own biases and blind spots. The conversation also touched on the evolution of wedding terminology in the LGBTQ+ space, with Sarah sharing her experiences of performing same-sex marriage ceremonies and Tania mentioning her first same-sex wedding.
LGBTQ+ Community Acceptance Discussion
The group discussed local community dynamics and experiences with LGBTQ+ acceptance in their respective areas. Tania shared her experience of performing same-sex marriages in a conservative area where Catholic ceremonies are common, noting that acceptance has improved but challenges remain. Student B mentioned that while Toowoomba is becoming more accepting, there are still some concerns about being openly gay. The conversation concluded with updates on Student B’s progress in her celebrancy course, where she reported completing ethical and legal issues modules and moving on to ceremony samples, with the next task being the business plan.
Course Assessment Progress Discussion
Student C discussed her progress on course assessments, specifically clarifying the distinction between ethical and legal considerations in her work. Tania shared a personal anecdote about her husband’s age relative to her father to help illustrate a point about perception. The conversation concluded with encouragement for Student C to continue working on her business plan, with reassurance that the focus is on practical application rather than assessing the plan’s viability.
Student Assessment and Feedback Updates
Sarah discussed the assessment process for student plans, emphasising that the important part is going through the process and developing ideas, which will likely evolve during practicals.
4 March 2026
Quick recap
The group discussed funeral planning processes and student progress updates, including feedback on assignments and technical issues with modules. The team concluded by addressing student progress, including documentation organisation and task completion, while emphasising the importance of incremental work submission.
Summary
Funeral Planning and Preparation Discussion
Tania asked about handling funerals without family dynamics, Sarah confirmed this was not something she had experience with, as there is always some family dynamic present.
Program Progress and Feedback Review
Student A discussed her progress in the first 10 days of her program, mentioning that she initially moved through the material quickly but has since slowed down to get ahead before an upcoming 10-day period when she won’t be able to work. Student A expressed gratitude for Tania’s helpful feedback and marking, and mentioned resubmitting one assignment that day after receiving Tania’s feedback.
Feedback Process and Module Issues
Student A and Sarah discussed feedback processes, with Student A confirming she always provides answers and reaches out when unsure. Student A reported an issue with audio in one module where she couldn’t see the visual content, but could still follow along using notes.
Client Review Management Discussion
Sarah discussed a vendor’s practice of leaving one-star reviews for other vendors, particularly when technology issues occur during ceremonies. She explained that PA system problems can be caused by various factors beyond their control, including wind, phones, and people blocking the equipment. The team agreed that their primary responsibility is conducting legal ceremonies rather than managing technical aspects like audio.
Student Progress and Task Updates
The team discussed progress updates from several students. Student A reported organising documentation and samples for future reference, and shared plans for upcoming holidays including a week and a half trip to Adelaide and Brisbane. Student B successfully completed her first task after initial confusion, with Sarah clarifying the distinction between public and private events based on invitation requirements. Student C was advised to submit his extension application form by next Wednesday before Sarah’s vacation, and was reminded to take tasks one at a time, starting with the naming task. The team emphasised the importance of submitting work incrementally to avoid repeated errors across multiple tasks.
18 February 2026
Quick recap
The group discussed Student A’s upcoming final rehearsal and ceremony, with the group discussing his progress and future plans as a celebrant. The conversation ended with a detailed discussion about wedding course materials, assessment systems, and the importance of proper documentation for Student A’s upcoming wait for registration.
Summary
Student A’s Final Rehearsal Preparation
Student A discussed his upcoming final rehearsal and ceremony scheduled for March 1st. Sarah expressed pride in Student A’s progress and encouraged him to complete his final tasks. Tania noted Student A’s moments of realisation about his attention to detail, with Student A acknowledging his occasional struggles with spotting errors despite his capabilities.
Future Celebrant Business Planning
Sarah, Tania, and Student A discussed the importance of learning from mistakes and the value of taking initiative. Tania praised Student A for his proactive approach and encouraged him to start working on promotional materials for his future celebrant business, emphasising the need to showcase his personality to stand out. Student A expressed uncertainty about his future plans but agreed to focus on preparing for his business.
Celebrant Setup and Documentation Planning
Student A discussed preparing for his 6-month wait for registration, focusing on setting up his website, social media, and documentation. Sarah advised Student A to gather all necessary documents, including Form 15s from Canprint, once he receives his Celebrant number. Tania and Sarah mentioned the Victoria BDM system for managing documents and certificates, noting that former students would be available to assist Student A with any questions.
Course Materials Assessment System Update
Sarah explained to Student B that the “student manual” option in the assessment system can be used to indicate when course materials are used, and clarified that this term will be updated to “course materials” in the future. T
Wedding Course Materials Review
The group discussed the wedding course materials, with Sarah confirming that 95% of the legal requirements are covered in the course manual. They agreed that while the manual is comprehensive at 400 pages, having separate PDFs for each module makes it less overwhelming for students. Student C expressed appreciation for the roadmap and mentioned thinking about how to operate their business, particularly regarding conflict of interest. Student A confirmed he would submit his script for the March 1st ceremony by Sunday.
4 February 2026
Quick recap
The group then focused on updates, including task progress, ceremony scheduling, and access to course materials, with Tania and Student A sharing insights about ceremony templates and standard practices. The conversation ended with discussions about portal technical issues and support for Student B’s return from leave, along with considerations for upcoming funeral services and the importance of proper documentation.
Summary
Celebrant Tasks and Course Access
Sarah welcomed everyone to the meeting, noting that there was no significant update on new guidelines for celebrancy. Student A shared that he had only two tasks left, including ceremonies for Helen and Jeanette on Saturday and Mohammad and Jasmine at the end of the month. He expressed his love for the work despite its exhaustion. Tania highlighted the demanding nature of celebrant work, emphasising the effort required to deliver ceremonies. Student A inquired about maintaining access to the celebrancy course materials after completing his tasks, to which Sarah confirmed that access would be available indefinitely. Tania advised that 90% of ceremonies should follow standard templates, with materials available for handling curveballs.
Portal Challenges and Solutions
Sarah and Student C discussed the challenges with the portal, including technical issues and data loss, with Student C sharing personal experiences and offering advice to save work in Word to avoid future problems. Tania supported this advice, emphasising the importance of grammar and spelling checks, and the group shared light-hearted comments about common spelling errors. Sarah reassured Student C of ongoing support and encouraged perseverance, while Student C expressed optimism about overcoming portal-related difficulties.
Student B’s Task Progress and Deadline
Sarah welcomed Student B back from leave and discussed his progress on tasks. Student B reported that he had done some paper drafts of upcoming tasks during his time away. He mentioned that he had engaged his husband as a motivator to help him stay on track with his work. Sarah reminded Student B about the deadline for submitting his current task to be eligible for an extension.